[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=9Zq8AdGMyfwyp1nwyjD+PCGQydA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:09:16 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Joern Engel <joern@...fs.org>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
werner <w.landgraf@...ru>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc5-git2 boot crashs
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Wait a bit; _can_ we get there with non-NULL ->s_master_inode et.al.?
> iput(NULL) is a noop... I don't think so, since logfs_init_journal()
> is not called until after we initialize that list.
>
> Not that I'd object against taking that initialization earlier, of course,
> but there seems to be something else going on... Which iput() it is?
Not something I can guess from the oops, sadly. Gcc has inlined
everything into logfs_mount, and the "0x44f/0x5cc" offset isn't very
helpful (with the same compiler version and config options it would be
possible to figure it out).
But looking at it, logfs_init_mapping() is currently called before
"s_freeing_list" is initialized, and it sets up at least
s_mapping_inode. So if anything fails between that point and the point
where we initialize s_freeing_list, I think we're toast.
I didn't check the other inodes, but at least that one does seem to be
potentially non-NULL. No?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists