[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110430050951.GA16557@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 01:09:51 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Allow setting of number of raw devices as a module parameter
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 05:07:04PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 04:28:17PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:24:29 +0200
> > Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> >
> > > Allow setting of maximal number of raw devices as a module parameter. This
> > > requires changing of static array into a vmalloced one (the array is going to
> > > be too large for kmalloc).
> > >
> >
> > Changelog failed to describe why the patch is needed. Lacking that
> > information, we have no reason to apply it.
>
> Good point, how about:
> People like running their machines with thousands of raw
> devices, yet distros don't want to take up that much memory for
> all users. Provide a way for everyone to be happy without
> forcing the module to be rebuilt by providing the ability to
> specify the number of raw devices as a module parameter option.
I remember when this was made a config option, thinking "8192 raw devices?
who would need that many?". I have to wonder just how someone manages
a system with an insane number of these devices.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists