[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110501183120.GA29964@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 20:31:20 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Vince Weaver <vweaver1@...s.utk.edu>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: re-enable Nehalem raw Offcore-Events support
* Vince Weaver <vweaver1@...s.utk.edu> wrote:
> I spend a lot of time dealing with developers who use perf-counter related
> interfaces all the time. They complain to me *constantly* about the
> drawbacks of perf_events, because PAPI is one step up from the kernel.
>
> I try to get them to interact with the kernel people, but they won't. Do you
> know why? Because they feel like the perf_events developers are rude at
> best, unhelpful in general, and actively anti-anyone-not-using-perf.
Arnaldo, the maintainer of perf tooling (and with whom most users complaining
about perf would be interacting) is one of the most responsive maintainers and
developers i've ever seen. I have not seen him brush off a single user
bugreport or complaint, ever - let alone be 'unhelpful' or be anti-anyone.
Ditto for Peter.
They didnt even brush *you* off, ever.
Let me guess, you just made that argument up, right?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists