linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/5] platform-drivers-x86: add support for Technologic Systems TS-5xxx detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1304368433-sup-4264@sfl>
Date:	Mon, 02 May 2011 17:07:29 -0400
From:	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jonas Fonseca <jonas.fonseca@...oirfairelinux.com>,
	platform-driver-x86 <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
	lm-sensors <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] platform-drivers-x86: add support for Technologic Systems TS-5xxx detection

Hi,

Thanks you all for your comments, I'll consider them carefully.

Excerpts from Greg KH's message of 2011-04-29 19:32:30 -0400:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 06:21:48PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> > +/proc filesystem
> > +----------------
> > +
> > +Information about the TS board is available through the /proc/ts-sbcinfo.
> 
> Really?  Why?
> 
> As you now have added a new kernel/user ABI, it must be documented in
> Documentation/ABI/
> 
> Please include that in your next patch.
> 
> But first off, why a new proc file?  What is it used for?

I think it could be useful for the user to know what option is available
or not on the board.

> 
> > +static int ts_sbcinfo_init_buffer(char *buf, struct ts5xxx_sbcinfo *sbcinfo)
> > +{
> > +    char *pos = buf;
> > +
> > +    pos += ts_addbuf(pos, "Board ID", "TS-%d", sbcinfo->board_id);
> > +    pos += ts_addbuf(pos, "RS485", "%s", sbcinfo->rs485 ? "yes" : "no");
> > +    pos += ts_addbuf(pos, "AnalogToDigital", "%s",
> > +             sbcinfo->adc ? "yes" : "no");
> > +    pos += ts_addbuf(pos, "Auto485", "%s", sbcinfo->auto485 ? "yes" : "no");
> > +    pos += ts_addbuf(pos, "SRAM", "%s", sbcinfo->sram ? "yes" : "no");
> > +    pos += ts_addbuf(pos, "External Reset", "%s",
> > +             sbcinfo->external_reset ? "yes" : "no");
> 
> Most of these look like they should be simple "one value per file" sysfs
> files for your system.  That would make things much easier on your
> userspace tools to handle parsing them properly, right?
> 
> Why not do that instead?

I had a look at other drivers, and /sys/devices/platform/ts/ seems to be
a good place to hold those entries (one per options as you suggested).
Do you agree with that?

By the way, as they would be sysfs attributes, is Documentation/ABI the
best place to add the documentation file?

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Regards,
Vivien.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/