[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=1guAvjXO2FVOPV+4=p53jeU3vUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 10:41:34 -0600
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: michal.simek@...alogix.com, johnlinn@...cast.net,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, joe@...ches.com,
John Linn <john.linn@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] tty/serial: add support for Xilinx PS UART
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>> I don't agree with this change. NO_IRQ for microblaze, arm and other is -1. BTW:
>> For ppc is 0. Using NO_IRQ seems to me reasonable.
>
> 0 means "no interrupt".
>
> The old mis-use of -1 is an old mostly ARM specific ugly that ahould be
> going away not getting repeated further. If Microblaze is using this hack
> then it needs to stop.
This will be easier for microblaze when I finish the irq_domain work.
There are patches on the list, but they need to be reworked before
they are ready for mainline consumption.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists