linux-kernel - Re: -longterm kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110507190124.GA18913@kroah.com>
Date:	Sat, 7 May 2011 12:01:24 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Cc:	stable@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: -longterm kernels

On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 05:57:50PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 08:40:40AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Nope, I'm not making such a rule, as you are trying to tell others what
> > to do here.  And I'm not going to do that.
> 
> That was only a proposition, telling you what to do was not my intention.

Ah, but that's the main issue here.

It's a matter of people stepping up and doing things, not setting rules
for what others are to maintain, right?

Back to one of your points, is Red Hat somehow not aware of the current
stable/longterm situation and wishes to have things change here?  Last
time I discussed this with the kernel maintainers there, they were fine
with how things are working, has this now changed?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/