[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105100023220.13325@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 00:25:04 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@...ax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
To: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please don't hijack patches - even trivial ones (was: Re: [PATCH
13/14] HPFS: Move declaration up, so that there are no out-of-scope
pointers=
On Mon, 9 May 2011, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Sun, 8 May 2011, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
> > Move declaration up, so that there are no out-of-scope pointers
> >
> > Reported-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@...ax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
> >
So change it to:
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
> Hmm. I'm a little currious how my original Signed-off-by got turned into a
> Reported-by for this patch?
I don't know. I probably checked the code independently after your report
and ended up fixing exactly the same thing that you fixed.
Mikulas
> This patch is *exactely* the one I submitted on Dec 24 in a message with
> Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1012242020090.28973@...mpdragon.chaosbits.net>
>
> Ok, it's a trivial little thing, but still. When the patch is completely
> unchanged I think it's a little steep to change the original authors
> Signed-off-by and essentially claim authorship of the patch for one self.
>
>
> > ---
> > fs/hpfs/ea.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.39-rc5-fast/fs/hpfs/ea.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.39-rc5-fast.orig/fs/hpfs/ea.c 2011-05-05 01:03:00.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6.39-rc5-fast/fs/hpfs/ea.c 2011-05-05 01:03:01.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ int hpfs_read_ea(struct super_block *s,
> > unsigned pos;
> > int ano, len;
> > secno a;
> > + char ex[4 + 255 + 1 + 8];
> > struct extended_attribute *ea;
> > struct extended_attribute *ea_end = fnode_end_ea(fnode);
> > for (ea = fnode_ea(fnode); ea < ea_end; ea = next_ea(ea))
> > @@ -93,7 +94,6 @@ int hpfs_read_ea(struct super_block *s,
> > ano = fnode->ea_anode;
> > pos = 0;
> > while (pos < len) {
> > - char ex[4 + 255 + 1 + 8];
> > ea = (struct extended_attribute *)ex;
> > if (pos + 4 > len) {
> > hpfs_error(s, "EAs don't end correctly, %s %08x, len %08x",
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
> --
> Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
> Plain text mails only, please.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists