linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/19] mfd: Use mfd cell platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 May 2011 10:45:01 +0200
From:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/19] mfd: Use mfd cell platform_data for wm8400 cells
 platform bits

Hi Mark,

On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 02:32:04AM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> 
> >  static int wm8400_codec_probe(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
> >  {
> > -	struct wm8400 *wm8400 = mfd_get_data(to_platform_device(codec->dev));
> > +	struct wm8400 *wm8400 = codec->dev->platform_data;
> 
> It'd be better to use platform_get_drvdata() here rather than accessing
> the pointer directly.
Is the core codec code setting the driver_data pointer appropriately ?

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/