[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110510103256.58d61861@bob.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 10:32:56 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Amit Virdi <amit.virdi@...com>
Cc: <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>, <samuel@...tiz.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shiraz HASHIM <shiraz.hashim@...com>,
Armando VISCONTI <armando.visconti@...com>,
Viresh KUMAR <viresh.kumar@...com>
Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context
> On analysis, I found that this is due to the change introduced in
> tty_ioctl.c where the termios mutex is taken to protect against
> parallel throttle/unthrottle. Probably IrCOMM stack code wasn't
> tested before merging this patch.
>
> Please suggest what should be done with the IrCOMM protocol stack
> code to resolve this problem?
It looks like the comments are wrong
/*
* Just give it over to the line discipline. There is no need to
* involve the flip buffers, since we are not running in an
interrupt
* handler
*/
appears to be completely untrue
I suspect it just needs to use the tty_flip_buffer functions properly
instead of trying to do clever shortcuts
tty_insert_flip_string(self->tty, skb->data, skb->len);
tty_flip_buffer_push(self->tty);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists