[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DCA4C29.20403@st.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:13:21 +0530
From: Amit Virdi <amit.virdi@...com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"samuel@...tiz.org" <samuel@...tiz.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shiraz HASHIM <shiraz.hashim@...com>,
Armando VISCONTI <armando.visconti@...com>,
Viresh KUMAR <viresh.kumar@...com>
Subject: Re: sleeping function called from invalid context
Hey Alan,
On 5/10/2011 3:02 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> On analysis, I found that this is due to the change introduced in
>> tty_ioctl.c where the termios mutex is taken to protect against
>> parallel throttle/unthrottle. Probably IrCOMM stack code wasn't
>> tested before merging this patch.
>>
>> Please suggest what should be done with the IrCOMM protocol stack
>> code to resolve this problem?
>
> It looks like the comments are wrong
>
> /*
> * Just give it over to the line discipline. There is no need to
> * involve the flip buffers, since we are not running in an
> interrupt
> * handler
> */
>
>
> appears to be completely untrue
>
> I suspect it just needs to use the tty_flip_buffer functions properly
> instead of trying to do clever shortcuts
>
>
> tty_insert_flip_string(self->tty, skb->data, skb->len);
> tty_flip_buffer_push(self->tty);
>
> .
>
I incorporated the change suggested by you and tested the stack again.
It is working perfectly fine - no stack trace is printed now. I'll be
sending the patch soon.
Thanks n Regards
Amit Virdi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists