linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] usb: gadget: storage: Add fsg_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <op.vvbgh8ge3l0zgt@mnazarewicz-glaptop>
Date:	Wed, 11 May 2011 14:19:10 +0200
From:	"Michal Nazarewicz" <mina86@...a86.com>
To:	"Roger Quadros" <roger.quadros@...ia.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, stern@...land.harvard.edu, sshtylyov@...sta.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] usb: gadget: storage: Add fsg_get_toc helper

> On 04/05/2011 06:43 PM, ext Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:59:27 +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> + default:
>>> + /* Multi-session, PMA, ATIP, CD-TEXT not supported/required */
>>> + return -EINVAL;

> On 04/05/2011 06:43 PM, ext Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>> Can we fall back to the old behaviour here?

On Wed, 11 May 2011 09:49:36 +0200, Roger Quadros <roger.
> What old behaviour? I didn't understand.

Before we were just ignoring the type of ToC requested, right?
So can we fail back to the ToC we served then when we hit
an unsupported TOC?  Or does it make no sense at all?  I'm not
saying it does.  It probably doesn't. ;)

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +-----<email/xmpp: mnazarewicz@...gle.com>-----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/