[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A961E3870077E34C8FEF355D71BFDEAAC77C26CE4B@mtk-sms-exch01.digi.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:27:25 -0500
From: "Kilau, Scott" <Scott.Kilau@...i.com>
To: 'Greg KH' <gregkh@...e.de>
CC: "'mreed10@...ibm.com'" <mreed10@...ibm.com>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
'Alan Cox' <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] 8250_pci: Add support for the Digi/IBM PCIe 2-port
Adapter
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@...e.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 2:43 PM
> To: Kilau, Scott
> Cc: 'mreed10@...ibm.com'; 'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'; 'Alan Cox'
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] 8250_pci: Add support for the Digi/IBM PCIe 2-port Adapter
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:28:07PM -0500, Kilau, Scott wrote:
> > --- linux-2.6.38.6-vanilla/include/linux/pci_ids.h 2011-04-21 16:34:46.000000000 -0500
> > +++ linux-2.6.38.6/include/linux/pci_ids.h 2011-04-27 14:56:30.000000000 -0500
> > @@ -1476,6 +1476,7 @@
> > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_NEO_2RJ45 0x00CA
> > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_NEO_2RJ45PRI 0x00CB
> > #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_NEO_4_IBM 0x00F4
> > +#define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_NEO_2_OX_IBM 0x00F6
> Please see the top of this file for why you shouldn't be adding new
> device ids into it.
> Third time's a charm?
> thanks,
> greg k-h
Sorry about that.
Should I just be putting them into 8250_pci.c directly instead?
I was conflicted as to where to put it, as I saw this comment in 8250_pci.c, before a list of device ids:
/* This should be in linux/pci_ids.h */
Thanks for your help!
Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists