[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1305153267.2606.57.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:34:27 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Raghavendra D Prabhu <raghu.prabhu13@...il.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Reduce impact to overall system of SLUB using
high-order allocations
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 15:28 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2011, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > OK, I confirm that I can't seem to break this one. No hangs visible,
> > even when loading up the system with firefox, evolution, the usual
> > massive untar, X and even a distribution upgrade.
> >
> > You can add my tested-by
> >
>
> Your system still hangs with patches 1 and 2 only?
Yes, but only once in all the testing. With patches 1 and 2 the hang is
much harder to reproduce, but it still seems to be present if I hit it
hard enough.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists