[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DCBC0E8.5020609@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 14:13:44 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Raghavendra D Prabhu <raghu.prabhu13@...il.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Reduce impact to overall system of SLUB using high-order
allocations
On 5/12/11 1:34 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 15:28 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 May 2011, James Bottomley wrote:
>>
>>> OK, I confirm that I can't seem to break this one. No hangs visible,
>>> even when loading up the system with firefox, evolution, the usual
>>> massive untar, X and even a distribution upgrade.
>>>
>>> You can add my tested-by
>>>
>> Your system still hangs with patches 1 and 2 only?
> Yes, but only once in all the testing. With patches 1 and 2 the hang is
> much harder to reproduce, but it still seems to be present if I hit it
> hard enough.
Patches 1-2 look reasonable to me. I'm not completely convinced of patch
3, though. Why are we seeing these problems now? This has been in
mainline for a long time already. Shouldn't we fix kswapd?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists