linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -V5 00/24] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 May 2011 00:16:13 +0200
From:	Björn JACKE <bj@...Net.DE>
To:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	sfrench@...ibm.com, agruen@...bit.com, dilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
	sandeen@...hat.com, bfields@...ldses.org, jlayton@...hat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V5 00/24]  New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl
 interoperability

Hi,

On 2011-02-28 at 16:11 -0500 Ted Ts'o sent off:
> What is the current status of this patch series?  I seem to remember
> that Christoph and Al Viro had some objections; have those been
> cleared yet?  If not, can you summarize what their objections are?
> 
> To be honest I haven't been paying super close attention to this patch
> series, and I'm curious what needs to happen with it one way or
> another.

after the discussion of this path submission thread are there any major or
minor issues left that prevent these to go upstream? I'd really love to see
NFSv4 ACLs being available on Linux, too.

Cheers
Björn

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped