[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zkmqobhi.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 21:10:09 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Björn JACKE <bj@...Net.DE>,
"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, sfrench@...ibm.com, agruen@...bit.com,
dilger.kernel@...ger.ca, sandeen@...hat.com, bfields@...ldses.org,
jlayton@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V5 00/24] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability
On Thu, 12 May 2011 00:16:13 +0200, Björn JACKE <bj@...Net.DE> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2011-02-28 at 16:11 -0500 Ted Ts'o sent off:
> > What is the current status of this patch series? I seem to remember
> > that Christoph and Al Viro had some objections; have those been
> > cleared yet? If not, can you summarize what their objections are?
> >
> > To be honest I haven't been paying super close attention to this patch
> > series, and I'm curious what needs to happen with it one way or
> > another.
>
> after the discussion of this path submission thread are there any major or
> minor issues left that prevent these to go upstream? I'd really love to see
> NFSv4 ACLs being available on Linux, too.
>
I updated richaclv23 branch at
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kvaneesh/linux-richacl.git;a=summary
which is rebased against latest linus tree. The changes pass richacl
test against local file system. I am yet to test richacl on NFS
client. Once i get the results i will repost the series again.
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists