[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110512144255.5c4d4e84.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 14:42:55 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Torsten Hilbrich <torsten.hilbrich@...unet.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel BUG when syncing ext2 if USB stick is removed
On Thu, 12 May 2011 16:54:40 +0200
Torsten Hilbrich <torsten.hilbrich@...unet.com> wrote:
> The error can be reproduced in both linux-2.6 master
> (3568bd9720b4a775f28a718fcbb462ce2f386988) and v2.6.38.6. It cannot be
> reproduced in v2.6.38.5, because the error occurs only after:
>
> commit 1f74c190e1e97a38823c07fdc71780580a0fc03f
> Author: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
> Date: Fri Apr 22 10:39:59 2011 -0500
>
> put stricter guards on queue dead checks
>
> commit 86cbfb5607d4b81b1a993ff689bbd2addd5d3a9b upstream.
>
> in the 2.6.38 stable line.
A 2.6.38.5 -> 2.6.38.6 regression is presumably also a
2.6.38->2.6.39-rc regression.
> Here is the error message for master:
>
> general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> last sysfs file:
> CPU 1
> Modules linked in:
>
> Pid: 1926, comm: sync Not tainted 2.6.39-rc7+ #39 LENOVO 20077KG/20077KG
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811231bf>] [<ffffffff811231bf>]
> __mark_inode_dirty+0x14f/0x200
> RSP: 0018:ffff88007bebbe08 EFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: ffff88007d031470 RBX: ffff88007d031408 RCX: ffff88007d031470
> RDX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RSI: ffffffff81d33f2a RDI: ffffffff82002300
> RBP: ffff88007bebbe28 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: ffff88007bde3d68 R11: ffff88007c2fba6f R12: ffff88007c350300
> R13: ffff88007c350458 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffffff81127e30
> FS: 00007f8306063700(0000) GS:ffff88007fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 0000000001f40600 CR3: 000000007b968000 CR4: 00000000000006a0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Process sync (pid: 1926, threadinfo ffff88007beba000, task ffff88007c610820)
> Stack:
> ffff88007d031550 ffffea0000082638 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> ffff88007bebbe58 ffffffff8112a5ff ffffffff81d3c8d8 ffff88007d223eb0
> ffff880002541400 ffff88007d223eb0 ffff88007bebbe78 ffffffff8112a6b6
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8112a5ff>] __set_page_dirty+0x6f/0xc0
> [<ffffffff8112a6b6>] mark_buffer_dirty+0x66/0xa0
> [<ffffffff8117c3ce>] ext2_sync_super+0x8e/0xf0
> [<ffffffff8117c495>] ext2_sync_fs+0x65/0x80
> [<ffffffff81127dfe>] __sync_filesystem+0x5e/0x90
> [<ffffffff81127e4f>] sync_one_sb+0x1f/0x30
> [<ffffffff81100021>] iterate_supers+0x71/0xd0
> [<ffffffff81127e8f>] sys_sync+0x2f/0x70
> [<ffffffff819c69ab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> Code: e8 67 be 89 00 48 8b 05 20 47 ff 00 48 8b 53 70 48 8b 4b 68 48 89
> 43 50 48 8d 43 68 48 89 51 08 48 89 0a 49 8b 94 24 58 01 00 00
> 89 42 08 48 89 53 68 4c 89 6b 70 49 89 84 24 58 01 00 00 fe
> RIP [<ffffffff811231bf>] __mark_inode_dirty+0x14f/0x200
> RSP <ffff88007bebbe08>
> ---[ end trace 04d7660d6043ca51 ]---
>
> If I parsed the error location correctly, it is the:
>
> next->prev = prev; // mov %rcx,(%rdx)
>
> statement from __list_del called via __list_del_entry, list_move from
> the line:
>
> list_move(&inode->i_wb_list, &bdi->wb.b_dirty);
>
> in __mark_inode_dirty. rdx seems to be
>
> Here are the steps for reproduction:
>
> 1. mount an USB stick with ext2 FS (mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt)
> 2. open file on USB stick for writing (cat > /mnt/foo)
> 3. press some return
> 4. Remove USB stick
> 5. In another console run sync
>
> I will append the full kernel log (screenlog.0) and the configuration
> (config-master) to this mail.
hm, maybe *bdi was freed at this time. But if so I'd have expected
__mark_inode_dirty() to crash earlier than in the list_move().
James, the cure looks worse than the disease - should we revert "put
stricter guards on queue dead checks" for now?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists