linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: Add __weak attributed functions for pwm operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 May 2011 09:25:28 -0700
From:	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
To:	Mohan Pallaka <mpallaka@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.intradead.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, rmk@...-67.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: Add __weak attributed functions for pwm operations

On Fri, May 13 2011, Mohan Pallaka wrote:

> For chip drivers that support both pwm and non-pwm modes
> would encounter compilation errors if the platform doesn't
> have support for pwm though the chip is programmed to work
> in non-pwm mode. Add __weak attributed pwm functions to avoid
> compilation issues in these scenarios.
>
> Change-Id: Ia507bf659d4d67d71f135012e7d919aca6c45c6c

Make sure you remove these 'Change-Id' lines before sending patches.
They aren't supposed to be in the kernel since they refer to an internal
server, and aren't useful to anyone else.

David

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/