linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: Add __weak attributed functions for pwm operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110515080031.GA12911@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date:	Sun, 15 May 2011 01:00:31 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Mohan Pallaka <mpallaka@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.intradead.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, rmk@...-67.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: Add __weak attributed functions for pwm
 operations

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 06:13:21PM +0530, Mohan Pallaka wrote:
> For chip drivers that support both pwm and non-pwm modes
> would encounter compilation errors if the platform doesn't
> have support for pwm though the chip is programmed to work
> in non-pwm mode. Add __weak attributed pwm functions to avoid
> compilation issues in these scenarios.
> 

Russell,

You seem to have authored pwm.h, do you have any objections to this
change?

Thanks!

> Change-Id: Ia507bf659d4d67d71f135012e7d919aca6c45c6c
> Signed-off-by: Mohan Pallaka <mpallaka@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/pwm.h |   12 +++++++-----
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
> index 7c77575..e0c8c3f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pwm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
> @@ -3,29 +3,31 @@
>  
>  struct pwm_device;
>  
> +/* Add __weak functions to support PWM */
> +
>  /*
>   * pwm_request - request a PWM device
>   */
> -struct pwm_device *pwm_request(int pwm_id, const char *label);
> +struct pwm_device __weak *pwm_request(int pwm_id, const char *label);
>  
>  /*
>   * pwm_free - free a PWM device
>   */
> -void pwm_free(struct pwm_device *pwm);
> +void __weak pwm_free(struct pwm_device *pwm);
>  
>  /*
>   * pwm_config - change a PWM device configuration
>   */
> -int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns);
> +int __weak pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns);
>  
>  /*
>   * pwm_enable - start a PWM output toggling
>   */
> -int pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm);
> +int __weak pwm_enable(struct pwm_device *pwm);
>  
>  /*
>   * pwm_disable - stop a PWM output toggling
>   */
> -void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm);
> +void __weak pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm);
>  
>  #endif /* __LINUX_PWM_H */
> 
> -- 
> Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/