linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] rcu commits for 2.6.40

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 May 2011 09:38:01 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] rcu commits for 2.6.40

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 04:40:59PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> 
> > > very clearly indicate that this is an RCU regression.
> > 
> > This might be the same one Yinghai found:
> > 
> >  e59fb3120bec: rcu: Decrease memory-barrier usage based on semi-formal proof
> > 
> > So with the config i sent it's definitely reproducible.
> 
> yes. And note that the system does not lock up, but boots up after a really 
> long time - perhaps as a side-effect of very rare timer irqs driving forward 
> the RCU state machine?

In the interest of focusing on the code paths that are actually being
executed...

Are you guys seeing NMIs at about the time the slowdown occurs?

							Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/