linux-kernel - Re: merge of real-time 2.6.33.9-rt31 with stable 2.6.33.13

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1105141827270.3078@ionos>
Date:	Sat, 14 May 2011 18:28:26 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: merge of real-time 2.6.33.9-rt31 with stable 2.6.33.13

On Sat, 14 May 2011, John Kacur wrote:
> I did some light testing merging 2.6.33.13 into real-time 2.6.33.9-rt31.
> In addition I cherry-picked 3c955b407a084810f57260d61548cc92c14bc627
> in order to compile on newer distros.

Thanks.
 
> Here is the result of cyclic test on one machine
> sudo ./cyclictest -t32 -p 80 -n -i 10000 -l 10000
> policy: fifo: loadavg: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1/541 3759          
> 
> T: 0 ( 3728) P:80 I:10000 C:  10000 Min:      7 Act:  104 Avg:  114 Max:     470

The numbers are weird. How does that compare to older kernels on that
machine with the same test?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/