| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <BANLkTim68rrUkRi0r-5xo4T10r5ALgcQhg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 10:54:37 +0200 From: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, Carsten Emde <Carsten.Emde@...dl.org> Subject: Re: merge of real-time 2.6.33.9-rt31 with stable 2.6.33.13 On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote: > On Sat, 14 May 2011, John Kacur wrote: >> I did some light testing merging 2.6.33.13 into real-time 2.6.33.9-rt31. >> In addition I cherry-picked 3c955b407a084810f57260d61548cc92c14bc627 >> in order to compile on newer distros. > > Thanks. > >> Here is the result of cyclic test on one machine >> sudo ./cyclictest -t32 -p 80 -n -i 10000 -l 10000 >> policy: fifo: loadavg: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1/541 3759 >> >> T: 0 ( 3728) P:80 I:10000 C: 10000 Min: 7 Act: 104 Avg: 114 Max: 470 > > The numbers are weird. How does that compare to older kernels on that > machine with the same test? Note this was on a machine with a straight Fedora install, and no -rt packages or tuning. That being the case, the numbers are no better or worse than recent -rt kernels. I can get you numbers with the last kernel if you wish, on Monday. Perhaps Carsten would be interested in running his tests? John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists