linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Enable SMEP CPU Feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DD25FA4.7030307@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 May 2011 14:44:36 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Asit K Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Enable SMEP CPU Feature

On 05/17/2011 02:38 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >  Depends if the guest uses a read-modify-write pattern or not.  We could do it
> >  transparently in kvm.ko, since the real cr4 need not corresponds to the guest
> >  notion (for example, we often set cr0.wp or cr0.ts even though the guest
> >  wants them clear).
>
> Oh, being transparent is a nice touch when it comes to security measures
> (catching attackers who think there's no SMEP and such) - but that would need
> KVM support and a new ioctl to configure it, right?

Yes.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/