[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DD2605A.90506@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 14:47:38 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Asit K Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Enable SMEP CPU Feature
On 05/17/2011 02:44 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 02:38 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >
>> > Depends if the guest uses a read-modify-write pattern or not. We
>> could do it
>> > transparently in kvm.ko, since the real cr4 need not corresponds
>> to the guest
>> > notion (for example, we often set cr0.wp or cr0.ts even though the
>> guest
>> > wants them clear).
>>
>> Oh, being transparent is a nice touch when it comes to security measures
>> (catching attackers who think there's no SMEP and such) - but that
>> would need
>> KVM support and a new ioctl to configure it, right?
>
> Yes.
>
btw, KVM support is required anyway, you can't set random bits in cr4
(from either the guest or host userspace) - kvm needs to understand them.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists