[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110517115041.GF13475@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:50:41 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Asit K Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Enable SMEP CPU Feature
* Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 02:44 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >On 05/17/2011 02:38 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Depends if the guest uses a read-modify-write pattern or not.
> >>We could do it
> >>> transparently in kvm.ko, since the real cr4 need not
> >>corresponds to the guest
> >>> notion (for example, we often set cr0.wp or cr0.ts even
> >>though the guest
> >>> wants them clear).
> >>
> >>Oh, being transparent is a nice touch when it comes to security measures
> >>(catching attackers who think there's no SMEP and such) - but
> >>that would need
> >>KVM support and a new ioctl to configure it, right?
> >
> >Yes.
> >
>
> btw, KVM support is required anyway, you can't set random bits in
> cr4 (from either the guest or host userspace) - kvm needs to
> understand them.
Sure, that is the whole premise of this discussion.
I meant to say:
"but that would need KVM ABI support via a new ioctl to configure it, right?"
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists