[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110517115614.GG13475@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:56:14 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>,
Chris McDermott <lcm@...ibm.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 01:06:52PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > maintainers (and not assume lack of ack after 24 hours means acceptance), or
> > >
> > > Wrong, 72 to 96 hours. Sunday to Wednesday/Thursday.
> >
> > Not that this is really material (the argument is pretty much the same even had
> > you waited 3 days), but you are already wrong about the 'Sunday' part, because
> > you posted it to lkml on *Monday* 13:27 GMT:
> >
> > Message-ID: <20110509132738.GB16919@...00.arm.linux.org.uk>
> > Mon, 9 May 2011 09:27:52 -0400
>
> Sigh. So you're only looking at the _second_ posting of them, not the first.
>
> Here's the message, minus the patch.
>
> | Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 19:24:07 +0100
> | From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> | To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
> | "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> | Subject: i8253 clocksource consolidation
> | Message-ID: <20110508182407.GN27807@...00.arm.linux.org.uk>
> |
> | Ralf, John, Ingo, hpa,
I did not get that mail, at all. It's not in my spam mbox either.
This pretty much explains why you assumed us informed and should explain to you
why i was surprised by your way of handling the patch :-)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists