linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.39-rc7+ fs: Fix spinlock recursion in get_active

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110518181520.GA17242@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 18 May 2011 14:15:20 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Tim Gardner <timg@....com>
Cc:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.39-rc7+ fs: Fix spinlock recursion in
 get_active_super()

How can you reproduce that recursion?  Given that grab_super drops
sb_lock I can't see any way to hit it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/