linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.39-rc7+ fs: Fix spinlock recursion in get_active

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DD41544.2030508@canonical.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 May 2011 12:51:48 -0600
From:	Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.39-rc7+ fs: Fix spinlock recursion in get_active_super()

On 05/18/2011 12:15 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> How can you reproduce that recursion?  Given that grab_super drops
> sb_lock I can't see any way to hit it.
>

Dang, you're right. Consider it NAKd

rtg
-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner@...onical.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/