linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] ib_srpt: initial .40-rc1 drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt merge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTi=Xb-ypQNa3=MmwiLeE4Q9FWHnZXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 May 2011 12:40:02 +0200
From:	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc:	Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-rmda <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vu Pham <vu@...lanox.com>, David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ib_srpt: initial .40-rc1 drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt merge

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
<nab@...ux-iscsi.org> wrote:
> The srpt_port->port_wwn patch in question does
> current ensure that sport->enabled has been set via an configfs
> attribute at:
>
>   /sys/kernel/config/target/srpt/$IB_PORT_GUID/tpgt_1/enable
>
> and will reject all SRP login attempts to an individual struct srpt_port
> until the attribute has been explictly triggered.
>
> This allows ib_srpt to follow what is expected by rtsadmin-v2 +
> lio-utils, and used to generate /etc/target/srpt_start.sh used to save
> persistent fabric configuration.  Currently other fabrics like
> iscsi-target and tcm_qla2xxx expect to be able to reject fabric login
> requests before the full set of WWPN endpoints, LUNs, NodeACLs +
> MappedLUNs have been recreated during an typical init.d/target start
> operation.
>
> I think it makes sense to do the same for the SRPT control plane on an
> individual HCA port GUID basis as long as there are no underlying fabric
> issues, and that Roland is happy.  In terms of supporting more than one
> type of /sys/kernel/config/target/srpt/$WWPN/$TPGT/ layout, I would
> really like to avoid this for mainline code unless there is a really
> good reason..

I'm still wondering whether it was a good idea to switch from ib<n>
style names to port GIDs. Not only will that make it hard for users to
match the ib<n> names already assigned to InfiniBand HCAs with target
port names but this also deviates from the naming scheme used for any
other Linux device. Ethernet devices e.g. appear as eth<n> in /dev
instead of a MAC address like 00:1a:64:10:18:6f.

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/