[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110519165728.GB12525@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:57:28 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rmda <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Vu Pham <vu@...lanox.com>, David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ib_srpt: initial .40-rc1 drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt
merge
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:40:02PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> I'm still wondering whether it was a good idea to switch from ib<n>
> style names to port GIDs. Not only will that make it hard for users to
> match the ib<n> names already assigned to InfiniBand HCAs with target
> port names but this also deviates from the naming scheme used for any
> other Linux device. Ethernet devices e.g. appear as eth<n> in /dev
> instead of a MAC address like 00:1a:64:10:18:6f.
The ib# names returned by ip addr are already disjoint from the
namespace that is being used by SRP targets. The only choices are port
GUID or something like mlx4_0/1, the later is somewhat less
commonly used..
Is there some approach here for selecting the pkey as well?
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists