[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110519165851.GQ627@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:58:51 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: jan.kratochvil@...hat.com, vda.linux@...glemail.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, indan@....nu, bdonlan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] ptrace: add JOBCTL_BLOCK_NOTIFY
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 06:48:33PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 05/19, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 06:32:33PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Make sure @chlid is still ptraced by us and clear BLOCK_NOTIFY.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (likely((child->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) && child->parent == current))
> > >
> > > This looks a bit confusing... It is either traced or not. If it is traced,
> > > nobody else can trace it. In fact even PT_PTRACED is not strictly needed
> > > but I agree this check makes the code cleaner.
> >
> > Hmmm... I suppose we can make the error paths finer grained so that
> > attach failure
>
> Ah, you are right again, I forgot about PTRACE_ATTACH path.
We can move the PT_PTRACED and parenthood test outside the siglock tho
and I agree that the 'still ptraced' comment is misleading. I'll
update it.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists