[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110519104901.GC12404@erda.amd.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:49:01 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf, x86: Fix event scheduler for constraints with
overlapping counters
On 18.05.11 17:36:53, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 23:20 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > if (c->weight != w)
> > > > continue;
> > > >
> > > > - for_each_set_bit(j, c->idxmsk, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
> > > > - if (!test_bit(j, used_mask))
> > > > + /* for each bit in idxmsk starting from idx */
> > > > + while (idx < X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
> > > > + idx = find_next_bit(c->idxmsk, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX,
> > > > + idx);
> > >
> > > I'd be mighty tempted to ignore that 80 column rule here ;-)
> >
> > Please put the body of the loop into a helper function, the function is large
> > and there are countless col80 uglinesses in it!
>
> I just tried that, its real ugly due to the amount of state you need to
> pass around.
I will try to improve the patch and send a new version.
Thanks for review.
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists