linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PM: Remove CONFIG_PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 May 2011 15:07:24 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: Remove CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE

On Mon 2011-05-16 20:32:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, May 14, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> > 
> > Now that we have CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG there is no need for yet
> > another flag causing dev_dbg() and pr_debug() statements in the
> > core PM code to produce output.  Moreover, CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE
> > causes so much output to be generated that it's not really useful
> > and almost no one sets it.
> > 
> > References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23182
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>

ACK

> There are no comments, so my understanding is that no one has any objections to
> this patch.  If that really is the case, I'm going to put it into
> suspend-2.6/linux-next for 2.6.40.

And sorry for slow responses.

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/