[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110519162129.GC17265@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:21:29 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: jan.kratochvil@...hat.com, vda.linux@...glemail.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, indan@....nu, bdonlan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] ptrace: implement PTRACE_INTERRUPT
On 05/19, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 08:38:15PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 05/16, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > >
> > > + case PTRACE_INTERRUPT:
> > > + /*
> > > + * Stop tracee without any side-effect on signal or job
> > > + * control. At least one trap is guaranteed to happen
> > > + * after this request. If @child is already trapped, the
> > > + * current trap is not disturbed and another trap will
> > > + * happen after the current trap is ended with PTRACE_CONT.
> > > + *
> > > + * The actual trap might not be PTRACE_EVENT_STOP trap but
> > > + * the pending condition is cleared regardless.
> > > + */
> > > + if (likely(child->ptrace & PT_SEIZED) &&
> > > + lock_task_sighand(child, &flags)) {
> > > + child->jobctl |= JOBCTL_TRAP_STOP;
> >
> > The same race with do_signal_stop() afaics.
>
> I didn't understand that one,
Yeah, I was wrong, see the previous email.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists