[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110519182551.0c06cd10@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:25:51 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
Cc: <kumar.gala@...escale.com>, <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
<greg@...ah.com>, <akpm@...nel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-console@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] tty/powerpc: introduce the ePAPR embedded
hypervisor byte channel driver
On Thu, 19 May 2011 11:31:32 -0500
Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com> wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > You really also need a hangup method so vhangup() does the right thing
> > and you can securely do logins etc and sessions on your console. As
> > you've got no hardware entangled in this and you already use tty_port
> > helpers the hangup helper will do the work for you.
>
> So all I need is this?
>
> static void ehv_bc_tty_hangup(struct tty_struct *ttys)
> {
> struct ehv_bc_data *bc = ttys->driver_data;
>
> tty_port_hangup(&bc->port);
> }
>
> I've noticed that some drivers flush their transmit buffers before calling
> tty_port_hangup(), but some others don't. Should I do this too? I don't know
> if hangup should be as quick as possible.
Doesn't matter too much. If you can flush it quickly then do so
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists