[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110520105417.562c7341@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 10:54:17 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
Cc: <kumar.gala@...escale.com>, <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
<greg@...ah.com>, <akpm@...nel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-console@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] tty/powerpc: introduce the ePAPR embedded
hypervisor byte channel driver
On Thu, 19 May 2011 11:05:49 -0500
Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com> wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >> > + /* Pass the received data to the tty layer. Note that this
> >> > + * function calls tty_buffer_request_room(), so I'm not sure if
> >> > + * we should have also called tty_buffer_request_room().
> >> > + */
> >> > + ret = tty_insert_flip_string(ttys, buffer, len);
>
> > You only need to request_room in advance if you can't handle the case
> > where the insert_flip_string returns less than you stuffed down it.
>
> If tty_insert_flip_string() returns less than I stuffed down it, the characters
> it didn't accept will be dropped. That's because once I receive them, I have
> nowhere else to put them. I suppose I could implement a receive FIFO, but that
> seems overkill. If calling tty_buffer_request_room() ensures that
> tty_insert_flip_string() always accepts all the characters, I would rather do that.
I was answering the question in the comment in the code...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists