[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5843.1306239208@localhost>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:13:28 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Youquan Song <youquan.song@...ux.intel.com>,
"Song, Youquan" <youquan.song@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"hpa@...ux.intel.com" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@...el.com>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"Sankaran, Rajesh" <rajesh.sankaran@...el.com>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
"Liu, Kent" <kent.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86, vt-d: enable x2apic opt out
On Tue, 24 May 2011 08:38:47 BST, David Woodhouse said:
> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 05:18 +0100, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> > Do we want an actual WARN there, complete with stack traceback and
> > all?
> >
> > Or did you intend a pr_warn or printk(KERN_WARNING or similar?
>
> The traceback has been very useful in other BIOS issues, because it gets
> tracked and counted on kerneloops.org along with platform
> identification. So we have been able to track down the major offenders
> of some of the most egregious BIOS stupidities and make *some* progress
> on getting them to improve the untested dross they habitually turn out.
Oh OK... that probably is a good idea then.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists