[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1105241012080.1913-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 10:20:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>
cc: balbi@...com, 'Sarah Sharp' <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
<greg@...ah.com>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <ablay@...eaurora.org>,
'open list' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v12 7/8] usb: Adding SuperSpeed support to dummy_hcd
On Tue, 24 May 2011, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
> Hi Felipe
>
> > > Yes :) The driver->speed is updated in usb_composite_probe() if
> > > CONFIG_USB_GADGET_SUPERSPEED is defined.
> > >
> > > So, are we ok with this solution? The module parameter I mean?
> > > Are you going to try the v13 in your branch? Please let me know how
> > it
> > > goes and of course if you have any comments.
> >
> > I think it still gives the possibility for failure. I would rather not
> > take that until all gadget drivers are fixed. We can help you doing
> > that and we only change driver->speed after all gadget drivers have
> > their "sensible defaults" SuperSpeed descriptors.
>
> By "until all gadget drivers are fixed" you mean until all gadget drivers
> provide SS descriptors? This will take for ever...
> I wasn't about to modify all gadget drivers and to add SS descriptors for
> them. I can add default values (as generate_ss_descriptors() did if you
> remember) but I don't think this is the right approach because as you said -
> different gadget drivers might have different SS descriptors and I don't
> feel confident enough to set these values. Nor do I have the ability to test
> each of the gadget drivers the way I would like to after this change.
> The only gadget driver I felt confident adding SS descriptors for is UASP,
> which I tested properly.
>
> Actually if the CONFIG_USB_GADGET_SUPERSPEED is turned off, which is the
> default of it, the speed won't be updated and all these series won't be
> functional so I don't see any possibilities for failure in such
> configuration. Or am I missing something?
dummy_hcd should work when CONFIG_USB_GADGET_SUPERSPEED is enabled,
even if the usb_gadget_driver structure is initialized with the speed
field set to USB_SPEED_HIGH. This will be true for all the standalone
gadget drivers until they are updated.
Which leaves a question about the composite gadget framework. Should
it be updated with SS support? Probably not until the various function
drivers have all been updated.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists