linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTimq31hMRa+vD=pLrtTAx=Hv=h0Acg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 May 2011 22:20:20 +0800
From:	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:17 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
>> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com> wrote:
>> > When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
>> > RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
>> > function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
>> > function.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
>>
>> Yup, it's true.
>
> (could whack the else while there)
>

Where is it, Mike?

thanks
           Hillf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/