[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1306247192.7501.25.camel@hiromu-MacBook>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 23:26:32 +0900
From: Hiromu Yakura <hiromu1996@...il.com>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zippel@...ux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: add warning about permission of config file
Hello,
On Fri, May 24, 2011 at 22:23, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz> wrote:
> Arnaud's point is that your patch should not be necessary at all,
> because kconfig already checks the return value of the fopen() call in
> conf_write() and prints the above message if it fails. So do you have a
> testcase where make <...>config without your patch returns without
> error, but the configuration is not written?
Sorry for misunderstanding.
Indeed, make *config which use 'conf' (e.g. oldconfig, defconfig...)
raise error.
And only xconfig and gconfig don't write the configuration without
error.
However, make *config using 'conf' hasn't function of 'Save as'.
In other words, if you don't set the write permission to the directory,
you would lose changes of the configuration.
I think that it is necessary to check permission at all so that kconfig
warn of the possibility of losing changes.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists