[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTin5ZDt5ZeckOJ2WsNUZm6mxmYiRwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:50:26 -0400
From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc: Hiromu Yakura <hiromu1996@...il.com>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zippel@...ux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: add warning about permission of config file
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz> wrote:
> On 24.5.2011 16:26, Hiromu Yakura wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Fri, May 24, 2011 at 22:23, Michal Marek<mmarek@...e.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>> Arnaud's point is that your patch should not be necessary at all,
>>> because kconfig already checks the return value of the fopen() call in
>>> conf_write() and prints the above message if it fails. So do you have a
>>> testcase where make<...>config without your patch returns without
>>> error, but the configuration is not written?
>>
>> Sorry for misunderstanding.
>> Indeed, make *config which use 'conf' (e.g. oldconfig, defconfig...)
>> raise error.
>> And only xconfig and gconfig don't write the configuration without
>> error.
>
> I see, qconf lacks a check for the return value of conf_write() in
> ConfigMainWindow::closeEvent(), gconf does check the return value, but only
> displays it in the bottom box of the main window instead of a message box.
> Neither of them return failure in the error case. These bugs should be
> indeed fixed.
>
agree.
> But I don't like the directory permission check, it only
> handles one case, but does not handle permission on the .config file itself
> with KCONFIG_OVERWRITECONFIG=1, ENOSPC and so on.
>
seconded.
- Arnaud
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists