linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] target: Convert REPORT_LUNs to use int_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 May 2011 17:52:12 -0700
From:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	Andy Grover <agrover@...hat.com>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Martin Svec <martin.svec@...er.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] target: Convert REPORT_LUNs to use int_to_scsilun

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 13:02 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 20:19 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
> > 
> > This patch converts transport_core_report_lun_response() to use
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c:int_to_scsilun instead of using the
> > struct target_core_fabric_ops->pack_lun() fabric provided API vector.
> > 
> > It also removes the tfo->pack_lun check from target_fabric_tf_ops_check()
> > and removes from struct target_core_fabric_ops->pack_lun() from
> > target_core_fabric_ops.h, and the following mainline scsi-misc fabric
> > modules:
> > 
> > *) tcm_loop: Drop tcm_loop_pack_lun() usage
> > *) tcm_fc: Drop ft_pack_lun() usage
> > 
> > Reported-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
> 
> There's no way this or the following patch count as bug fixes.  They're
> converging hand rolled functions and definitions (which is good, but not
> a bug fix).
> 

Correct, patches # 1 -> 4 where the bugfixes patches of this series that
needed to go to also go into stable, but the remaining two patches
requested by Mike and Christoph during iscsi-target review are >= .40
only material.

Thank you!

--nab


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/