[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1306256577.10201.13.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 13:02:57 -0400
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Andy Grover <agrover@...hat.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Martin Svec <martin.svec@...er.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] target: Convert REPORT_LUNs to use int_to_scsilun
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 20:19 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
>
> This patch converts transport_core_report_lun_response() to use
> drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c:int_to_scsilun instead of using the
> struct target_core_fabric_ops->pack_lun() fabric provided API vector.
>
> It also removes the tfo->pack_lun check from target_fabric_tf_ops_check()
> and removes from struct target_core_fabric_ops->pack_lun() from
> target_core_fabric_ops.h, and the following mainline scsi-misc fabric
> modules:
>
> *) tcm_loop: Drop tcm_loop_pack_lun() usage
> *) tcm_fc: Drop ft_pack_lun() usage
>
> Reported-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
There's no way this or the following patch count as bug fixes. They're
converging hand rolled functions and definitions (which is good, but not
a bug fix).
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists