linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v12 7/8] usb: Adding SuperSpeed support to dummy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <01c601cc1acf$8e28e920$aa7abb60$@org>
Date:	Wed, 25 May 2011 14:33:18 +0300
From:	"Tanya Brokhman" <tlinder@...eaurora.org>
To:	<balbi@...com>
Cc:	"'Alan Stern'" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	"'Sarah Sharp'" <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>, <greg@...ah.com>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<ablay@...eaurora.org>,
	"'open list'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v12 7/8] usb: Adding SuperSpeed support to dummy_hcd

Hi Felipe

> > > ---
> > > -*/
> > >
> > >  static struct usb_gadget_driver composite_driver = {
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_GADGET_SUPERSPEED
> > > +       .speed          = USB_SPEE_SUPER,
> > > +#else
> > >         .speed          = USB_SPEED_HIGH,
> > > +#endif
> > >
> > >         .unbind         = composite_unbind,
> > >
> >
> > I have no problem updating static struct usb_gadget_driver
> > composite_driver as you suggested but it seems the same as updating
> it
> > @ usb_composite_probe()...
> 
> still, you will have two places poking at the same field. It's better
> to keep it at once, update only that and we will take your approach.
> 

Ok so just to make sure I understand you correctly:
You want me to remove the modification made to usb_composite_probe() and
instead add:
static struct usb_gadget_driver composite_driver = {
+#ifdef CONFIG_USB_GADGET_SUPERSPEED
+       .speed          = USB_SPEE_SUPER,
+#else
	  .speed          = USB_SPEED_HIGH,
+#endif
	  .unbind         = composite_unbind,

And then you'll be ok with change? Or is there anything else?

If this is it then I'm relieved :) and of course will update the code.


Best regards,
Tanya Brokhman
Consultant for Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/