[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201105260809.19425.alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 08:09:15 +0200
From: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
To: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>
Cc: "'Grant Likely'" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qi.wang@...el.com,
yong.y.wang@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com,
kok.howg.ewe@...el.com, toshiharu-linux@....okisemi.com,
"'Fan, Yongning'" <yongning.fan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: pch_gpio: Support new device ML7223
On Thursday 26 May 2011 03:24:55 Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> > From: Alexander Stein [mailto:alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 9:10 PM
> >
> > > #define pch_gpio_resume NULL #endif
> > >
> > > +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_ROHM 0x10DB
> >
> > Should this be moved to pci_ids.h?
>
> OK.
> I will move this to pci_ids.h.
>
> > > static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(pch_gpio_pcidev_id) = {
> > >
> > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x8803) },
> > >
> > > + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ROHM, 0x8014) },
> >
> > Likewise for the product ID. While at it, the ID for EG20T
> > could also be moved in a separate patch.
>
> We have already upstreamed not only GPIO but also many device drivers(GBE,
> USBDEV,DMA,UART,SPI,I2C,CAN). Do you mean we must move these device
> definitions to pci_ids.h?
I just meant to move 0x8803 from the line above into pci_ids.h. It is
unrelated to your patch.
And if this _must_ be moved to pci_ids.h I'm the wrong person to decide.
Regards,
Alexander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists