[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110526061348.GA26775@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 08:13:48 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [tip:core/rcu] Revert "rcu: Decrease memory-barrier usage based
on semi-formal proof"
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> rcu: Start RCU kthreads in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state
>
> Upon creation, kthreads are in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state, which can
> result in softlockup warnings. Because some of RCU's kthreads can
> legitimately be idle indefinitely, start them in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
> state in order to avoid those warnings.
>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
this should also solve load average artifacts - do not
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks skew the load upwards?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists