linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] oom: oom-killer don't use proportion of system-ram internally

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 May 2011 18:56:24 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	caiqian@...hat.com
CC:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com, hughd@...gle.com,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, minchan.kim@...il.com,
	oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] oom: oom-killer don't use proportion of system-ram
 internally

>> @@ -160,7 +162,7 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p,
>> struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>> */
>> if (p->flags & PF_OOM_ORIGIN) {
>> task_unlock(p);
>> - return 1000;
>> + return ULONG_MAX;
>> }
> This part failed to apply to the latest git tree so unable to test those
> patches this time. Can you fix that?

Please apply ontop mmotm-0512.

Thanks.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/