linux-kernel - Re: UNIX Compatibility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <38084.1306411679@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 26 May 2011 08:07:59 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>
Cc:	Michael Witten <mfwitten@...il.com>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Richard Yao <ryao@...sunysb.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UNIX Compatibility

On Thu, 26 May 2011 13:30:39 +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch said:

> Or take the "unlink a directory gives EPERM" example: why is it
> specified with an errno that indicates that the user is not allowed to
> remove it (and not that the sys-call is the wrong one).

Because on some old Unix's, it wasn't the wrong syscall...

RATIONALE

Unlinking a directory is restricted to the superuser in many historical
implementations for reasons given in link() (see also rename()).

http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/unlink.html

I've encountered at least one system (admittedly 20+ years ago), where
unlink("./") actually did work. Took me a while to correlate the weird fsck's
at reboots to the program that tried to remove './$A' when $A was unset...

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped