[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110526184321.GC26219@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 14:43:21 -0400
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jrbarnette@...omium.org,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: dm: pass up rotational flag
On Thu, May 26 2011 at 2:29pm -0400,
Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com> writes:
>
> >> Allow the NONROT flag to be passed through to linear mappings if all
> >> underlying device are non-rotational. Tools like ureadahead will
> >> schedule IOs differently based on the rotational flag.
>
> Mike> Thanks for doing this, looks good in general.
>
> I'd rather we made the rotational property part of the topology instead
> of having to special-case it in DM. I seem to recall posting a patch
> that did that at some point but I can't seem to find it...
Sure, that'd work too.
Similarly, couldn't the discard flag be made part of topology?
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists