[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1vcwx47t4.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 14:48:23 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jrbarnette@...omium.org,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: dm: pass up rotational flag
>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com> writes:
Mike> Similarly, couldn't the discard flag be made part of topology?
Actually, now that I think about it I'm fairly sure my patch nuked the
discard queue flag because I was tired of keeping the flag and the
topology in sync. I don't think I mucked with the rotational flag.
Let me grep my patch queue and see. It must be in there somewhere...
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists